Of course. Twenty-five or thirty years gives you an opportunity to prepare. It also gives us the opportunity to make the arguments about trade. Trade means that I give you something and you give me something. These aren't trade deals in that conventional sense. This is about investor rights. This is about the free flow of capital. This is about the corporate community making whatever decisions they want.
Do we agree with a 25 to 30 year phase-out? The answer is yes, but more importantly, what should be in place is that in fact this isn't going to be fair trade. There has to be a snap-back provision that puts the 6.1% tariff back on. This can't be a situation where we go for 134,000 vehicles a year come into Canada and 500 go out to Japan, and that becomes 200,000 vehicles dropped into Canada and then 750 go to Japan. That's not what I call trade.