What I was referring to was we felt there was a situation where we know what the labour costs are in Mexico, what the labour costs are in Peru and in Chile. Each of those markets is different. There are different conditions in each of the markets on a variety of regulatory and labour practices and standards, and so forth. But all of this boils down to: what is the ultimate cost of finished goods that come from each of these locations and from our own location, and how competitive are we going to be against them? There is clearly a difference in the labour costs that we pay here in Canada so people can have a reasonable quality of life here versus what a producer is paying in Equador or Mexico, and so forth.
We have had to adjust over time and we have had to look at increasing automation. We've taken a lot of steps to make sure we're much more efficient and a less costly producer, to ensure that we remain competitive, because we compete against each of these member states in a variety of markets that we currently service. I'm really talking about the fact that we have to look very carefully at that. In these agreements there are going to be not just actual wages, but also additional costs to maintaining a labour force that we pay for here in Canada that others may not have to pay for.