The first thing I'd like to say is that FTAs exist specifically to set rules, so that investors can feel more secure in sending their capital to other countries. With better regulation there can be more investment on both sides.
Secondly, in the case of the Pacific Alliance, it's a living mechanism. We're accustomed to seeing these mechanisms in TPP or NAFTA or CETA, and there are methods that are going to be developed in the Pacific Alliance, including the parts about labour and investment protections.
There isn't a mechanism such as ISDS, which you mentioned, but we think that in a future version of the Pacific Alliance, we could move towards the measures that are typical in FTAs. This is because the Pacific Alliance is a mixture between the aspects that we consider crucial to FTAs, such as tariffs, which in any case have already been lowered to almost non-existence, and then other areas, which we have moved forward a great deal in models such as CETA and the TPP.