In fact, I'd like to say yes, but it will instead be no, because the debate on translation timelines is highly relevant. We need to have this debate. The situation raises questions that will be extremely important in the long term, not only for this committee, but for many others.
If we have to evaluate a new program that is about to come into effect and we have to wait that long, it's worth mentioning. We want to ask questions and delve into this issue.
In fact, the issue should be dealt with at a higher level than ours, not in every committee, because the situation could become generalized and problematic in many ways.
That being said, that's not what we're talking about. I think we're diluting the discussion by talking about translation issues, even though they deserve to be discussed. I see it as a separate issue altogether.