Evidence of meeting #21 for International Trade in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was taiwan.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Excellency Peter MacArthur  Ambassador, Embassy of Canada to the Republic of the Philippines
Excellency Shawn Steil  Ambassador, Embassy of Canada to the Socialist Republic of Vietnam
Excellency Jean-Dominique Ieraci  High Commissioner, High Commission for the Republic of Singapore
Henry Chi-Hung Liu  Executive Director, Economic Division, Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Canada
Andrés León  Committee Researcher
Clerk of the Committee  Ms. Dancella Boyi

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Randy Hoback Conservative Prince Albert, SK

Thank you, Chair.

Again, this is selective hearing by the Liberals. This belongs in this committee at this point in time. He can pick and choose what he wants to hear from the opposition's comments. The reality is that the business community is really having major issues with this ArriveCAN app, and this is going to impact our trade. This is the proper committee, because, as Mr. Masse said, they keep punting it from committee to committee so nobody will look at it. Well, we need to look at it; it's very important.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Judy Sgro

Mr. Savard-Tremblay is next.

5:25 p.m.

Bloc

Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay Bloc Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot, QC

Following up on my previous comment, I would like to move an amendment to the proposal.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Judy Sgro

Please do. Go ahead.

5:25 p.m.

Bloc

Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay Bloc Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot, QC

I move to strike what comes after “ArriveCAN”. I therefore move to strike out the text from “on travellers” to “but other”, and resume at “on other sectors of the Canadian economy that have come to depend on the efficient operation [...]” I’m fine with the rest of it.

I also suggest that we change “two meetings” to “one meeting.”

I hope everyone understands what I mean and has access to interpretation.

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Randy Hoback Conservative Prince Albert, SK

Can we read it the way the Bloc would like to see it, just so I can hear the entire motion?

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Judy Sgro

Yes, I'm just waiting for our clerk to have it down clearly so that everyone knows exactly what it is we're voting on.

June 6th, 2022 / 5:25 p.m.

The Clerk of the Committee Ms. Dancella Boyi

Thank you, Madam Chair.

Mr. Savard‑Tremblay, correct me if anything is missing.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Judy Sgro

Hold on. Mr. Baldinelli, just hold on.

Can you read it out so we're clear?

5:25 p.m.

The Clerk

I will read it in French:

That, pursuant to Standing Order 108(2), the committee prioritize its agenda in order to undertake a study of no less than 1 meeting before the 2022 summer adjournment of the House to study and learn more about the impacts the ArriveCAN application is having on other sectors of the Canadian economy which have come to rely on the efficient operation and facilitation of cross-border travel and trade to ensure their economic recovery from the COVID‑19 pandemic; and that the committee report its findings and recommendations to the House.

5:25 p.m.

NDP

Brian Masse NDP Windsor West, ON

With a subamendment to the amendment that it be two meetings, I think it would make it a terrific motion.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Judy Sgro

It reduces it to one meeting and makes a few changes there.

5:25 p.m.

NDP

Brian Masse NDP Windsor West, ON

So, I'm proposing—

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Judy Sgro

Mr. Baldinelli, you look as if it's not clear to you.

Do you want to hold this down until the beginning of Wednesday's meeting, or are you ready?

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Tony Baldinelli Conservative Niagara Falls, ON

No, I'm fine with the amendment to change the wording. My concern is that I would prefer having two meetings instead of one. To Mr. Hoback's suggestion, perhaps we could hold one before the summer recess and possibly one afterwards.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Judy Sgro

Mr. Masse.

5:25 p.m.

NDP

Brian Masse NDP Windsor West, ON

I'm just asking for an amendment to the amendment so that it be two meetings.

If it's a friendly amendment, we can just go ahead with one vote, to my friend here who I think has made a really good proposal.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Judy Sgro

And you would like to see it stay at two meetings?

5:25 p.m.

NDP

Brian Masse NDP Windsor West, ON

Yes.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Judy Sgro

Monsieur Savard-Tremblay is saying one meeting.

5:25 p.m.

NDP

Brian Masse NDP Windsor West, ON

Yes. If he's okay with my amendment to that, then we're good to go.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Arif Virani Liberal Parkdale—High Park, ON

Madam Chair, I just need some clarification.

I understood Monsieur Savard-Tremblay's amendment. I do not understand Mr. Masse's.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Judy Sgro

Mr. Masse is moving a subamendment that he wants to see two meetings, not one meeting.

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Tony Baldinelli Conservative Niagara Falls, ON

But we're comfortable with the wording change.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Arif Virani Liberal Parkdale—High Park, ON

That's all before the summer recess.