No. Let me finish and I will.
When people talk about ArriveCAN, they're talking about a technological device that's going to help facilitate access through the border. For example, I've had extensive discussions with people at the Greater Toronto Airports Authority who are quite fond of ArriveCAN and want it to stay in place because it's an instrument that allows quicker movement through the airport. The problem is that it's been stigmatized because of this vaccination connection.
When you make statements like “the government had its foot on your throat”, I think that's a bit unfair because, as we heard from some of the other witnesses, you're talking about staffing shortages and COVID restrictions. The border was closed for almost two years. That had nothing to do with vaccination. It certainly had nothing to do with ArriveCAN. It had everything to do with the pandemic.
The problem, as I see it, is that everybody blends all of these together and ArriveCAN becomes the symbol for the problem, when really it's a solution to a lot of problems at the border.
Sir, now I'll let you finish answering the question.