With regard to the first question, through the course of the exploratory discussions and public consultations, what we've determined is that it is worthwhile to proceed with this negotiation and essentially to add it to a longer-term regional strategy that has been going for 25 years, really, alongside others in the Andean and Latin American region, like Chile, Peru, Colombia, Panama, Costa Rica, Honduras, Mexico—and above it, if you think about it that way, as a puzzle piece available to complete FTA coverage on the Pacific coast of Latin America. What we have found is that most of the interested exporters, in particular, see it as an additional market in a region that they are already exporting to or are interested in considering beginning to export to.
On the second one, of course, we basically have floor-level coverage through the World Trade Organization rules with a country like Ecuador. If we proceed with the FTA, we will have an advantage competitively over countries that don't have an FTA, like the United States. Conversely, if we don't, we would have a disadvantage vis-à-vis economies like the European Union, Chile and soon South Korea, which do have free trade agreements with Ecuador.