To elaborate, we're very sensitive, and we're talking to these stakeholders weekly. On some of the issues, what they're identifying as system discrepancies, frankly, we're seeing as features. In other words, they think the system is broken and it's not calculating correctly, but when we take it back and look at it, our legislative interpretation is that we think we're doing it correctly.
Some of the tension around CARM working effectively has to do with whose legislative interpretation is correct. If we're offside from the business community, we have to work together to narrow that gap as much as possible. However, that's a policy and legislative interpretation issue and not necessarily an IT defect or readiness issue.
That is coming out through integrated testing with trade chain partners, and we're not insensitive. Again, we've heard them asking for additional weeks to allow them to fully adjust their own internal systems to be in sync with what we're trying to do, and we're working actively on a plan to give them that. However, the testing has revealed we have different interpretations of how to calculate customs duty in this country.