In some ways, you're stumbling onto some of the challenges we have identified through the use of the customs tariff. Because it's on a shipment-by-shipment basis, broad-based reporting around high risks of use of forced labour in general industries would not necessarily allow us to have a successful detention at the border. The burden of proof is that the particular car that is in front of you has a particular chassis which was made from aluminum that was produced using forced labour. Therefore, because it's shipment by shipment, it becomes a very challenging level to get to. Then, for the next shipment of cars, we'd have to re-prove that the exact same supply chain is in place in order to determine that they were made with forced labour. It becomes inherently difficult, on a shipment-by-shipment basis, under the customs tariff, which, I think, is one thing that Bill C-35's intent aims to address.
