Obviously, we're anxious for Canada, and really the Province of Ontario, to make decisions on CANDU technology for both the Bruce site and the Ontario Power Generation site at Wesleyville. That will go a long way toward alleviating concerns—if there are any concerns, and it doesn't sound like there are many concerns—on any political, regulatory or financial moves. I think once they see Ontario building CANDUs, the phone is going to ring off the hook at Candu.
It's going to take that team Canada approach. We've certainly seen it over the last year in particular, when Canada has been locking arms. When I say “Canada”, it's the Canadian government, and our Canadian supply chain partners have also been locking arms. Potentially even operators here in Canada can be providing that expertise to countries without a nuclear ecosystem when they're looking to build nuclear for the first time, again with the regulator being resourced properly so that they can share information with the regulator.
What we're hearing over and over again from countries and regulators in those countries is that they don't want to reinvent the wheel. If a CANDU reactor is regulated and operated safely—which we have done for 60 years in Canada and in other countries around the world—then why would they create a new process? Let's rely largely on the work that's been done by the regulator in Canada, while of course making sure that the site-specific regulation that you're talking about, be it in Turkey, Poland or wherever it might be, is being met—