Harmonization is good in theory, but be careful what you wish for with harmonization because sometimes it harmonizes to a code or to a level that our particular country might not be comfortable with.
There is the regulation of natural health products, for instance. Canada has a high level of regulation for health products. We love that. It speaks to the success of our companies in Canada and the level of ethics that they work to. The U.S. tends to have a lower level of regulation for health products. We want to keep it at that level we have. Obviously, if there was a way to bring the U.S. up to that level, that would be good.
I think, based on risk, there are ways that we can lower the regulatory barriers for companies so that we focus on either higher-risk products or higher-risk operations, and then free up those lower-risk products to be sold more quickly, often while they're on trend. If a company wants to introduce a natural health product, sometimes it can take them, in Canada, 12 to 18 months to get that approved at a regulatory level. In that time, the ingredients in that product might not be on trend anymore for people in the natural health space. Meanwhile, they've been selling it in the U.S. and Mexico for the last 12 to 18 months, so that's definitely a challenge that we would like to see overcome.