Okay, I understand what you're saying, but if you look at the “other sexual offences”, there are 179 cases, and 307 cases of “sexual assault”. If you add those together, that's 486 cases of conditional sentencing with “other sexual offences” and “sexual assault”. Then I go to chart 12 and I see one-third of the conditional sentencing with regard to Bill C-9 in the same year, 2003-04 are “sexual assault”, 246 cases. Yet in chart 7 we're talking about 486 cases that received.... You have to explain to me exactly why there is that difference.
On September 21st, 2006. See this statement in context.