I'm going to give you the same explanation I gave earlier. In terms of organized crime, in our opinion, this can be defended because of the actual definition of organized crime. Where we agree is that it does depend on the amount of violence used in the commission of the crime. At the same time, we don't really have a definition of violent crime. But I do agree that in terms of the list of crimes you have identified, there are indeed some that probably would not be included under that definition.
As far as we are concerned, the idea of the violence involved is extremely important, whether it is between individuals or in terms of the effect it has on society--in other words, when the crime is perceived by the public as being violent.