Thank you very much. I think all of your input is important to our process here. I thank you for coming, and I hope I see you in other situations also.
I want to go over the way this bill is currently set up. As you are aware, in the last Parliament there was another bill that set up a different way of looking at a tightening, but not as extensive as this one.
Maybe I'll go first to Ms. Gray-Donald.
We have private members' bills coming forward in the House. A lot of them are in the vein of, because they think this bill is automatically going to make it through and be the law, “Well, let's just put everything up so it's now maximum ten years and we're going to get here.”
There's a thing of security and there's a sense of false security around that, and I'll take the example that you gave, the luring offence. There's a private member's bill coming up later this week or next week on that one.
Is it your understanding that if that gets into this category, that would mean there would be no conditional sentencing? I just want to see the depth of your organization's understanding of what would actually happen if that were the case.