If you've gone through this list—and I can put this to all of you—do you think that, for instance section 340 of the code, destroying documents on file, which has a ten-year maximum.... Is that something you think should be part of this?
I'll give you a couple of others: stop mail with intent; instruments for forging or falsifying credit card; public servant refusal to deliver property; criminal breach of trust; theft over $5,000; drawing a document without authority; obtaining an advantage based on a forged document—that could be somebody using a false ID to get into...I don't know, to take a ride on a train or something that requires a pass....
These are also captured, and when I hear your testimony as an advocate for victims, I'm not sure this would be in your catchment area of concern, but it is in the catchment area the way the bill is currently drafted.
Are these types of property offences—and I'll categorize them as that—a matter of concern for you?