Let me finish, Ms. Prober. You heard the evidence that we took before the committee on Bill C-2 last time, from I think probably the three leading experts in the country. They made it quite clear that there were gradations. So taking the factual situation that the professor put before us, I think he was saying that sexual abuse occurred in that case thirty years before, it was discovered now...no other evidence of any other sexual abuse. Let me add another factor to that.
Assume that after that first incident there was treatment and the person responded to treatment, because, again, those experts told us that in the low-end cases treatment was in fact viable--not in the hard-wired cases, I'll accept that, but in the low-end cases. Given that factual situation--the treatment was given, the person did not reoffend in any way over the balance of that thirty-year period--would you still prohibit the use of conditional sentences?