I do want to comment a bit on this amendment, and I thank Mrs. Barnes for bringing it forward. The government, though, will not be supporting the amendment, and I'll tell you why.
The breakdown seems to be on the issue of.... You've listed terrorist offence, criminal organization offence, and serious personal injury offence. There's a reason why this bill was drafted the way it was. There's a reason why the maximum was set. Where we used the maximum of 10 years or greater, it is because we wanted to have a law that generally applied in that area, without going through an itemized list.
I'll give you a good example, something that wouldn't be captured by your amendment: Internet luring. A private member's bill has been introduced in the House. This is something that's very serious. It seeks to increase the maximum punishable to 10 years. This bill wouldn't capture that. And we, on this side, do not feel that for the offences we've listed here, which the Government of Canada has already said they recognize as punishable by a maximum of 10 years, and in some cases a maximum of 14 years.... We've already identified them as being serious offences. We feel that when we proceed by way of indictment, a conditional sentence should not be available. And your amendment does not capture that. It means that someone who's been convicted of Internet luring--