I prefer to express it in the following fashion: the commission gave weight to certain factors that I think could have been better placed in other ways, or not as great weight placed on those.
I mentioned some of those in my remarks. I mentioned the urban salaries and the private practice lawyers' salaries. Again, it's not to say they're unreasonable. It's simply that they place different weight on those factors than I would have placed.
Ultimately, it's not the commissioner's decision. It's our decision as parliamentarians to determine what weight is to be given to each factor, provided we do not err in respect of the constitutional and statutory principles.