I understand, but they still are members of the organization itself.
I worked in the trenches for years--when I say “trenches”, I mean the law court trenches in Fort McMurray--and I spent considerable time arguing cases before many courts. I even went to the Court of Appeal on a particular occasion. I saw over the some 11 years I did this that different judges react in different ways to court processes. I don't know how it could be done, but I'm wondering if your organization has thought about any way you could tie the wage to work ethic.
For instance, in my own particular area, the Honourable Judge Stan Peck is a very hard-working man--extremely hard-working--but other members of the profession in different areas, because of the caseload, quite frankly just don't work very much. I've heard stories of where they'll work a day a week, or an hour or two hours a day for four or five days and then go golfing and other things. Quite frankly, I find it extremely disturbing. I think most taxpayers would find it disturbing.
I would direct this question to both the CBA and Monsieur Garant. This government stands for accountability, transparency, and getting something of value for taxpayers' money for work performed and wage received. Has the organization looked at ways to tie wage to performance?