No, you misinterpreted. They make good decisions on the basis of the law as written. Judges apply the law. They don't make social policy. Parliament makes social policy. So from a social policy point of view, as a parliamentarian, I say that in respect of impaired driving causing death, there shouldn't be the availability of conditional sentences. And a judge, then, looking at the law, would say that there are no conditional sentences for impaired driving causing death. That is a social policy, then, put into law, which the judges apply. If the judges apply it, they're making good law. But you can't blame a judge by saying, “Oh, the judge gave him a conditional sentence when....”
On November 7th, 2006. See this statement in context.