As a final follow-up, you mentioned the problem is whether or not you have the more repetitive offender--you used a fancier word--and whether the non-repetitive offender, so to speak, can be rehabilitated.
What I'm getting at is that in some cases judicial discretion might lead to a probation order with conditions. Do you think this bill and increasing mandatory minimums take away some judicial discretion? How important should judicial discretion be to the community?