With respect to the prosecutors, it is difficult to say. I would suggest that there are probably many prosecutors who would agree with the bill. Similarly, I would say there are many prosecutors who would disagree with the bill. It's not an uncommon incident, where we have already some of the mandatory minimums and it's an exceptional case and the prosecutor will say “Look, I agree that this sentence does not mandate a year because of the background circumstances as to why this person may have had this gun, but my hands are tied”, and they have to get the year. Their hands are tied as well because even though they can proceed in some of these offences either by summary procedure or by indictment, they're directed to go by indictment.
Frankly, if the attorney general has now spoken today and indicated his position, I would think that from the prosecutors--they're not defence lawyers, who really don't answer to anyone--if the big boss is saying he's in favour of it, you are going to have to be careful to see what they're going to say on the record.