I can't give you a list right now. I suppose I put some faith in courts of appeal--in the trial judge and in the courts of appeal.
Certainly we see regularly in Ontario many offences that do not have mandatory minimums, yet judges routinely hand out prison sentences, often sometimes penitentiary sentences, because the Court of Appeal has said this is what you would normally do. The Court of Appeal then sets out the sorts of situations that seem to be exceptional.
An exceptional circumstance is one that I think would shock the conscience of people that a particular individual is going to jail. I can't necessarily give you an example here. It's one of those things, though, that I think a judge would recognize, and that sort of finding would be subject to appeal by the Court of Appeal.
So I don't think it's likely to result in a widespread disavowal of the use of mandatory minimums. I think what it would mean is that it would be an exemption that would be possible in limited circumstances.