That certainly could arise. Mr. Hangar asked me a similar question last time. The situation now is that paragraph 718(2)(e) is simply part of the overall provisions of sentencing, so mandatory sentences override the opportunity of a judge to do anything other than sentence the person for a period of time. So with a mandatory minimum, all the judge can do is say that if you're an aboriginal offender, maybe you'll get four years and not six, but they can't move outside of the minimum that's mandated by the Criminal Code.
It is possible that we might launch a challenge to that, but currently the way the judges interpret this is that they have no discretion to go below the mandatory minimums. That's exactly one of the reasons why we're urging an exemption in the legislation to allow for consideration in exceptional circumstances that would allow for those sorts of issues to be addressed by the judge.