I'd like to get one more question in. Thank you, though—although I don't think that provided any more research-based evidence.
I can tell you're a very astute attorney general, so you'd know the law very completely. I'm wondering about your opinion on this.
It is suggested that some of these bills, including this one, offend the principles of sentencing, as was already talked about—proportionality, aboriginal peoples, reducing the discretion of judges. Nothing of these is reducing the maximums; they're all there still. Judges can give the same maximums with all these bills. I just wonder whether you have any views as an attorney general on this question of offending the principles of sentencing and decreasing judicial discretion.