There are two parts. First of all, I've never expressed a problem and I don't particularly have a problem with the ceiling of these sentences. Also, in terms of getting tougher, the kinds of sentences a judge has been giving and can continue to give can in fact be significant. My objection to the legislation is the mandatory minimum, which I find problematic.
I find it a problem for you to bring in the issue of spousal assault. Clearly that is serious, and the government has responded over the years with zero tolerance, and serious sentences have been given to individuals who inflict violence on their spouses. I see that to be quite a separate issue from this debate over firearms.