The problem with a yes or no answer for that is the problem with the concept of organized crime. I was interested, just a moment ago we were talking about the notion of pattern of criminality. Our definition of organized crime is, as someone said, three people involved in something. We've even done away with the notion of pattern of offences. In Canada, we've always looked toward RICO, the American “racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations” legislation. That at least had kept the idea that to be a RICO offence, it had to have a pattern of offences. So we did away with it. It was too hard to prove a pattern in order to call somebody an organized criminal. So that was done away with. And now it's almost as if we're coming in the back door and saying we can call you a criminal organization without there being a pattern, but as soon as you've got the second offence, we can wham you with the consequences of that second offence.
We started in Canada by not even using the term “organized crime”, enterprise crime, and we restricted it to some 24 or 25 offences. Now literally it is a concept that applies to everything that's at all serious. So yes, given that definition, it applies to street gangs.