Ms. Sampson, the minister didn't come to us with this bill saying it was decreasing costs. I heard that for the first time today.
But I did have a question for Mr. Rudin. The heart of this is taking away judicial discretion, and when we start talking about what's relevant on mandatory and whether it's this timeframe or that, I would like your comment on what happens to the individual before the court when you take away judicial discretion.
I also want to have your comment on what happens when you give it to prosecutors, because that's not in the open courtroom as much as the prosecutorial discretion. Is that why you've turned it to your constitutional challenge area? Because that was a unique perspective, and I wanted to hear a bit more about it.