On the selection, yes.
I have a quick question for you, Professor Stuesser. You had mentioned the exception. We studied conditional sentencing, and the concern there is that what starts out as the exception becomes the rule.
Just so there's no confusion, you mentioned criminal negligence causing death and manslaughter. There are penalties associated with those, of course, but those are not included in this bill. This bill focuses on someone who deliberately sets out to commit a serious crime with a firearm.
Perhaps you wouldn't mind elaborating a bit on what you think an exception would look like, as I think you're the second person who's mentioned it. The concern obviously is not wanting the exception to be the rule, sending the clear message that firearms offences are taken seriously.