That's an important distinction, and I think the government is keen on getting a political message out. They may also care about item two—your second alternative—in substance. The second paradigm you mentioned is much more important, because the political messaging will only take us to the next election, and there might be an echo effect beyond that.
On another complaint, I'd like to know whether you think this bill addresses what is referred to sometimes as the revolving door of the criminal justice system. I think a lot of people confuse bail with the revolving door. Of course, before you get convicted of an offence, the door is a revolving door. You're in and out of court two or three times perhaps, with several days of trial. There's a huge revolving door there, and you're seen on the street as an accused.
Could you assist me? Do you see anything in this bill that would allow us, as political representatives, to show Canadians that this bill will address the revolving door?