No, it's not. It's to allow a child who at present does not have access to that parent to have access when that parent is dying.
On December 11th, 2006. See this statement in context.
On December 11th, 2006. See this statement in context.
December 11th, 2006 / 3:45 p.m.
Conservative
Rick Casson Conservative Lethbridge, AB
No, it's not. It's to allow a child who at present does not have access to that parent to have access when that parent is dying.
See context to find out what was said next.