May I answer your question, madam?
I don't claim that this is the ultimate measure. As Mr. Ouellette said, money is the lifeblood. For my part, I said that organized crime and the proceeds of crime are indissociable. Despite all the efforts that have been made, it seems to me that the Criminal Code lacks a presumption concerning the proceeds of crime, as a result of which, when the Crown has proven a certain number of elements, it's up to the accused to explain that he has in his hands assets that can in no way be justified based on his legitimate income.