The first part contains a reference to subsection 95(1), while the second part mentions mandatory minimum penalties, as proposed. Is that correct?
On February 13th, 2007. See this statement in context.
On February 13th, 2007. See this statement in context.
Réal Ménard Bloc Hochelaga, QC
The first part contains a reference to subsection 95(1), while the second part mentions mandatory minimum penalties, as proposed. Is that correct?
See context to find out what was said next.