Given how this committee usually operates, it's not really our style to just adopt something as potentially complex as this.
I realize these things are not off-the-wall suggestions; they come from real situations, and I know Monsieur Ménard himself has done plenty of consultation in generating these.
With a view to avoiding unintended consequences, where our recommendations might seem peculiar in the new light of day and in different circumstances, I'm wondering whether we could alter the wording to read--and it happens often in Parliament, where this wording is inserted, where we urge the government to consider the advisability of (a), (b), (c), and (d), rather than our concluding now that these suggestions, as drafted, are exactly what is needed.
That allows the government to consider the advisability, to consider them in a proper context, and then respond to the committee, provide a reply in the appropriate time in responding to our report.
I'd be very happy to support that kind of an approach, where we altered the wording to say, “the committee urges the government to consider the advisability of...”.