If I may address the second part of your question, which is what we are doing to try to get a higher percentage of orders, if I can put it that way, the bill will have more samples coming in simply by expanding the number.
With respect to getting more orders where a primary designated offence has been committed, or a secondary for that matter, there are maybe three things.
First, there is this new category, where it's mandatory for the judge to eliminate any discretion in those 16 very serious offences. There will be some transfers into the primary, so we should get some more opportunities there.
Secondly, though--and I think this is perhaps more important--the bill in front of you has a new provision that will allow the judge to set a hearing up to 90 days after imposing sentence. We've been told by prosecutors, “We missed it. We're sorry. We can't go back to the judge; he's functus.” We're willing to give this 90-day window. It's our hope that prosecutors across the country will develop a system to look at their files and make an application when they have missed that so we'll get many more orders.
There is a third way we will get more into the data bank. There is slippage between the number of orders made and the number of orders executed. That has to do with people who don't show up. The judge makes an order--even these days they're making it a condition of probation or whatever--but they seem to disappear into the system and finding them gets to be difficult. That process we talked about earlier, where one police force can authorize another police force, should simplify the way...so when we find these people, we will get more of them in.
Those are the ways we believe this will increase the percentage of orders that are made.