And then Mr. Ménard has accepted Ms. Jennings' amendment. That raised the same concern with me. On the idea of a website that gathers evidence, as a kind of clearinghouse or a deposit for all of this evidence, could it somehow be breached, or could that create more unintended consequences, such as the one Mr. Comartin pointed out?
From my perspective, there are a lot of new ideas here, and a lot of things that we should discuss. I don't outright have any problem with anything Mr. Ménard has put forward for discussion, but I would be hesitant to adopt a motion like this without having heard evidence specific to the motion.
In my view, it would be responsible for the committee to hear some evidence regarding the motion before we make a recommendation to the government. I know Mr. Ménard may have had discussions with Montreal police or some other groups, and that those discussions may have led him to come up with these five recommendations, but I certainly haven't heard that evidence in a committee setting. I'm wondering what his thoughts are on that.