All I can tell you is this, Mr. Comartin. I think this is a good piece of legislation that helps repair some of the technical glitches in the old Bill C-13, so I think it's an improvement to the system. But in answer to Mr. Ménard's question, I believe, this is not the last word on this subject, and I don't think anybody should be under any illusions about that. Just as we revised a number of times the wiretap provisions in the Criminal Code in the late eighties and early nineties when we had to respond to changes both in technology and court decisions and had to move on them, I don't think this is the last word on the subject.
Now, whether I will be back here in another six months asking you for other technical amendments, it certainly is not my intention today and not what I would propose and not what I would want to do, quite frankly.
With respect to the last half of your comments and your question with respect to a review, I'm open to suggestions from you. I see the rationale and the importance of a review, and I would be pleased to respond to any thoughts you might have in that regard. As you pointed out, whether this went to the public safety committee or to a subcommittee of the justice committee, you'll probably end up on the committee one way or the other. So your workload isn't going to be lightened either way, but that being said, I'm open to suggestions on that, and I would be pleased to have any comments from this committee, or from any other member, for that matter.