Okay. I hope my third question will not be as sensitive in nature.
I want to touch on something you raised earlier. You talked about the limitation, which you referred to in your presentation as the “reasonable and proportional test”. You mentioned that you yourself had preferred not to apply it in the passport scenario, because you felt that, to some extent, this exceeded the scope, although I believe that you could do so under the legislation, correct?
I want to know whether there are any precedents whereby recourse to these powers did not work? You have censured yourself this time but, with regard to the application of the statutory provisions, have there been any instances when things went awry?