So if my partner and I were in an undercover operation and made a decision because we thought it would be best to resolve the problem but it wasn't quite covered under the training program.... I'm just trying to get a scenario.
Is the individual protected if he takes that one extra step that would be law-breaking but may not be covered? Who determines that? I don't know if I'm making myself clear. I could almost see two guys saying, “Should we do this? I don't think we're allowed to, but it would solve the problem if we did.”