Can I interrupt you there? How does that happen, then? We know we have this tool—and I appreciate the comparison to fingerprinting—and that it has made a profound change in the way we investigate crimes.
Take, for example, a situation where someone has committed murder and been convicted of the offence, and yet no DNA sample is sent to the data bank. That was happening, and that is why the committee recommended that we ensure that those most serious ones do not fall through the cracks.
Can you take me through how it would happen that a sample doesn't end up in the data bank when clearly it should?