Perhaps I misunderstood your question earlier. I had taken you to mean a presumption beyond the close-in-age exemption, and I just wanted to correct that.
I don't know the answer to that question. I do know that in the past, based on past law, what we have agreed to would pass constitutional muster, we believe. You're asking something that obviously needs further discussion. And the nature of the presumption would vary, if it were to be a presumption of a relationship with greater than the close-in-age exemption.