Thank you.
Thank you very much for coming, Mr. Copeland.
On the reporting mechanisms that were set out in the legislation, the reason the limited information was there and you have so little is because it was supposed to not disclose any information that would compromise investigations or sensitive law enforcement identities, and it takes consideration of the life and safety of the people involved or whether it's going to be prejudicial to an ongoing legal proceeding or be in any other way that's contrary to public interest.
I understand what you're saying to us about limited information. Having the knowledge that is the rationale behind this section, how would you suggest that any of the information currently provided could be widened if these are the areas of concern? It's all well and good to say you don't get enough information, but if you don't come with some concept of a solution to that problem that doesn't compromise the very real reasons why that reporting mechanism was set up in this way, it isn't as helpful.
Do you have some suggestions of what we should be trying to do if we were going to do more, or do you concede that the rationale originally was well intentioned and probably correct for what it's intended to do?