On that issue, if you provide a defence to a married couple, you'd be denying the same defence to a couple similarly situated, and that would raise a concern about charter discriminatory treatment. Parliament has seen those issues in recent years.
So that would be a significant concern. In fact, it would be a very high charter risk to have that differential treatment. Based on the stats that we have, the majority of cases would fall in the category that wouldn't benefit from the defence.