The charter risks are not at all the same for the two scenarios described.
If you provide a permanent defence to a married couple, but not to a common-law couple, the charter risk is very high. The charter risk in the other situation is in fact what Bill C-22 proposes, and we do not have the same risks.
Could somebody bring a challenge? It's always possible someone could bring a challenge, but the evidence is there to mount a very significant, meaningful defence against that challenge.
You would be in a different situation. That's our assessment.