This is certainly a point of debate that we have entered into over the last couple of days. I made note that on the one hand, as members have pointed out, it could be that the amendment creates an opportunity for individuals to get around the provisions of the bill and that this could be seen as going against the principle. On the other hand, as other members have argued, it would want to be mindful of unintended consequences and avoid criminalizing behaviour that the bill does not intend to capture. These are the two arguments that we're covering right now.
On April 19th, 2007. See this statement in context.