I indicated to you, or it has been indicated to you before, that we're making every effort to make sure it is cost neutral as close as possible. Obviously, there are costs associated with setting up any new office or regime.
That being said, you asked with respect to the need for this. The AG, as you correctly pointed out, is not completely divorced from this in terms of the individual; there are still rights and responsibilities reserved to the Attorney General.
But I am of the opinion that it is a step in the right direction. Again, you quite correctly pointed out we are doing this for preventative purposes. I think that's legitimate. I am careful to suggest that previous attorneys general did not abuse the responsibility that was given to them, but to the extent that we move these decisions and put some distance between the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions, I think it's a good move.
Mr. Saunders, do you have any comments on that as well?