Yes, and we have not yet had the opportunity to reply to Ms. Aucoin, since we were in the midst of preparing our committee appearance, and we knew that she would be speaking before the committee. We expressed our opinion earlier. To our mind, no change has been proposed. The discussion, as it were, reached a dead end. Because if ever the committee decided to strike this amendment, and the decision is supported by Parliament, the code would still contain clause 531 which sets out changes in jurisdiction. That would not be the end of it. The problem, if there is one, and I do not believe there is, dates back to 1978, and the provision has been in the code since then. This bill has nothing to do with that.
On May 2nd, 2007. See this statement in context.