I heard your concern. I'm sorry, please continue.
Are you asking with respect to the change of venue for trial, why we are doing that?
I'll indicate to you some of the information that I had on that. I guess your concern is why would we permit a change of venue when a trial cannot be held in one of the official languages of this country in a particular territorial division?
The provision that's been in force since 1978, and Bill C-23 does not in any way change the provisions with respect to a change of trial, is simply to clarify the language. Again, there's been no change with respect to the provisions that exist in the Criminal Code. Our attempt was simply to clarify, but maybe I didn't get the import of your question.
Go ahead.