It's interesting that you should raise that. There is one provision, and I think it's a good one. The right to be informed of your right to have a trial in either official language is provided for individuals who are unrepresented by counsel. I guess the assumption was that lawyers are supposed to be smart enough to inform their clients. No doubt lawyers are smart enough to do that; I'm not casting aspersions on the legal community. But we don't want to leave it to chance, so one of the amendments before you requires that all individuals, whether they have counsel or not, be informed of their right to have a trial in either of the official languages. I, for one, like that idea.
It doesn't specify in what way that can be done. It can be done in terms of the judge orally informing the individual. It could be done in terms of documentation that's given to him. There's a combination of things, I suppose. I mean, documentation signs could be posted.
Again, that proposal seems to be a good one, so it's not left to chance. Most lawyers do provide that information to their clients, but why leave it to chance? I think that amendment addresses the concern you've raised.