I would like you to understand something, Ms. Aucoin. You know that currently, even if a trial is only heard in only one language in British Columbia, under common law, if two people are accused, then the trial can be separated in order to avoid having one defendant testify against the other. So, conceivably, a trial could be divided 38 ways, plus 38 more because of language considerations. Is that correct?
On May 3rd, 2007. See this statement in context.